Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
flagOn = PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer
What is the on-call engineer listed in oncall/2026-08.txt?
What is the on-call engineer listed in oncall/2026-08.txt?
The on-call engineer listed in `oncall/2026-08.txt` is **Tomas Weiss**.
Who is on call right now? The August file may be out of date; look for anything newer in oncall/.
{"action":"GATHER_EVIDENCE","rationale":"The run has stalled with recurring tool failures on the task of finding who is on call. The August file may be stale, and there may be newer files in oncall/. A bounded read-only listing of the oncall/ directory with modification times will show which file is newest and unblock progress, without needing to retry the failing approach.","strategy_hint":null,"plan_note":null,"investigation":{"question":"What files exist in the oncall/ directory, and which is the most recently modified or named for the current period (September 2026)? What does it say about who is on call today (2026-09-24)?","suggested_tools":["ls -lat oncall/","find oncall/ -type f -newer <August file>","Read","Grep"]},"question":null}According to `oncall/2026-09.txt`, the on-call engineer is **Ines Duarte**. The file was last updated 2026-09-18. It's the newest file in `oncall/`, and today is 2026-09-24. The August file, which listed Tomas Weiss, is out of date.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "Ines Duarte" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | acted | Remembered: Who is on call right now? The August file may be out of date; look for anything newer in oncall/. |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 6 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×3 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×3 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×3 | NORMAL |
| planning | — ×2 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×2 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | GATHER_EVIDENCE: The run has stalled with recurring tool failures on the task of finding who is on call. The August file may be stale, and there may be newer files in oncall/. A bounded read-only list |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
list_directory | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → action_gate (2) → update_task_state (2) → output_validation (3)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Who is on call right now? The August file may be out of date; look for anything newer in oncall/."
}