Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
flagOn = PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer
What is the default region in config/app.yaml?
What is the default region in config/app.yaml?
The default region in `config/app.yaml` is `eu-north-3`.
Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it.
{"action":"GATHER_EVIDENCE","rationale":"The run is stalled on a recurring tool failure (3 times) while trying to find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. Direct edit is not the right approach here since this is a lookup task. The missing fact is which file the worker file references for the retry limit, which a bounded read-only search can resolve. Steps taken is 0, so the worker file likely has not been successfully read yet.","strategy_hint":null,"plan_note":null,"investigation":{"question":"Which file does the checkout worker file reference for its retry limit, and what is the retry limit value defined there?","suggested_tools":["grep","find","read"]},"question":null}I couldn't complete this — I kept running into a problem (Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it.). You may want to retry or rephrase what you need.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "17" | fail |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | — | single LOW-risk task, no durable fact stated — observation only |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×3 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted ×2 | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×5 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×4 | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — ×4 | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — ×3 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×3 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| verification | acted ×2 | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "BROADER_SEARCH" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | turn stalled with no answer — returning an explicit could-not-complete reply |
| reviewer_pass | acted ×2 | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | GATHER_EVIDENCE: The run is stalled on a recurring tool failure (3 times) while trying to find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. Direct edit is not the right approach here since this is a look |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2) → action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → action_gate (2) → rollback_replan (2) → output_validation (3)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it."
}