Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
flagOn = PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer
What is the default region in config/app.yaml?
What is the default region in config/app.yaml?
The default region in `config/app.yaml` is `eu-north-3`.
Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it.
{"action":"GATHER_EVIDENCE","rationale":"The task is to find the retry limit the checkout worker uses, but the worker file points to another file. Failures are recurring (3x persistent tool failure) with zero steps of progress, likely from repeated direct edit attempts on an unlocated target. A bounded read-only lookup to open the worker file and follow its reference will resolve the missing fact without edits.","strategy_hint":null,"plan_note":null,"investigation":{"question":"Which file does the checkout worker file reference for its retry limit, and what is the retry limit value defined there?","suggested_tools":["Grep","Glob","Read"]},"question":null}I couldn't complete this — I kept running into a problem (Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it.). You may want to retry or rephrase what you need.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "17" | fail |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | — | single LOW-risk task, no durable fact stated — observation only |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×3 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted ×2 | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×5 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×4 | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — ×4 | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — ×3 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×3 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| verification | acted ×2 | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "BROADER_SEARCH" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | turn stalled with no answer — returning an explicit could-not-complete reply |
| reviewer_pass | acted ×2 | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | GATHER_EVIDENCE: The task is to find the retry limit the checkout worker uses, but the worker file points to another file. Failures are recurring (3x persistent tool failure) with zero steps of progre |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2) → action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → action_gate (2) → rollback_replan (2) → output_validation (3)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Now find the retry limit the checkout worker uses. The worker file points to another file for it."
}