Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
flagOn = PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposer
What is the timeout for the search flow in config/timeouts.yaml?
What is the timeout for the search flow in config/timeouts.yaml?
The search flow timeout in `config/timeouts.yaml` is **5s**.
Now what is the timeout for the export flow?
{"action":"GATHER_EVIDENCE","rationale":"The run has zero steps taken and a persistent tool failure has recurred 3 times while trying to answer a question about the export flow timeout. Repeating DIRECT_EDIT is not useful since this is a lookup question. A bounded read-only search of the working directory for timeout configuration in export-related code would either find the answer or show that the code isn't available, in which case the user should be asked.","strategy_hint":null,"plan_note":null,"investigation":{"question":"Where is the export flow timeout defined or configured, and what is its value? Also confirm whether any export-related code or config exists in the working directory.","suggested_tools":["grep","ls","find","read_file"]},"question":null}The section you want is called 'export_v2'.
The `export_v2` timeout in `config/timeouts.yaml` is **210s**.
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "210" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | — | single LOW-risk task, no durable fact stated — observation only |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×3 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted ×2 | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×5 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×4 | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — ×4 | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — ×3 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×3 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted ×2 | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — | investigation: read_file errored — EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "BROADER_SEARCH" (LOCAL replan) |
| recovery | acted | turn stalled with no answer — returning an explicit could-not-complete reply |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted ×2 | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| supervisor | acted | GATHER_EVIDENCE: The run has zero steps taken and a persistent tool failure has recurred 3 times while trying to answer a question about the export flow timeout. Repeating DIRECT_EDIT is not useful si |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → action_gate (2) → rollback_replan (2) → output_validation (3) → action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Now what is the timeout for the export flow?"
}{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 3,
"prompt": "The section you want is called 'export_v2'."
}