Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
What does data/index.csv say the row count is?
failureMatchOff PersonalAssistant with the semantic failure-mode matcher disabled (exact-string match only) vs flagOn PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposerfailureMatchOff vs candidate flagOnfailureMatchOff — controlflagOn — candidateno natural-language reply — ended on a harness directive / unrecovered stall
no natural-language reply — ended on a harness directive / unrecovered stall
no tool calls
no tool calls
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "512" | fail |
| not contains "no such file" | pass |
| not contains "cannot determine" | pass |
| not contains "file is empty" | pass |
| regex /512|catalog\.csv|renamed|replaced/i | fail |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "512" | fail |
| not contains "no such file" | pass |
| not contains "cannot determine" | pass |
| not contains "file is empty" | pass |
| regex /512|catalog\.csv|renamed|replaced/i | fail |
success no · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered no
| latency | 6828 ms |
| cost | $0.0054 |
| tokens | 403 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
| latency | 7328 ms |
| cost | $0.0067 |
| tokens | 378 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
Other seeds — seed 2: fail · $0.0053 · 6.6 s seed 3: fail · $0.0053 · 6.3 s
Other seeds — seed 2: fail · $0.0128 · 11.9 s seed 3: fail · $0.0130 · 14.8 s
What does data/index.csv say the row count is?
No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
What does data/index.csv say the row count is?
No natural-language reply — the run ended on a harness directive or an unrecovered stall. See the full harness trace below.
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| hypothesis | — | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 5 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted | Health: nominal |
| diagnostics | acted | a sub-dimension crossed the caution threshold |
| control_state | — | NORMAL |
| control_state | acted | Pausing — blocked |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | verification failed: Result is null — syntax check failed |
| recovery | acted | Trying a different approach — switched to "TRACE_EXEC" (LOCAL replan) |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → rollback_replan (1) → output_validation (2)