Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
contradictionOff = PersonalAssistant with the semantic contradiction check disabled (lexical pass only)
Earlier I told you our API rate limit is 100 requests per minute. Now please update the API docs to say the limit is 2000 requests per hour.
Earlier I told you our API rate limit is 100 requests per minute. Now please update the API docs to say the limit is 2000 requests per hour.
I don't see an earlier message in this conversation where you gave me the rate limit — this is the first turn I have, so I'm not carrying over that context. Also, I don't know where your API docs live. My working directory is `/tmp` and it's not a git repo. Could you tell me the path to the docs file you want updated? One thing worth flagging: 100 requests/minute works out to 6000/hour, but you're asking the docs to say 2000/hour. If that's intentional (e.g., a tighter hourly cap), no problem — just confirming it's not a typo.
{"description": "the API docs: update the rate limit statement to say 2000 requests per hour (previously stated as 100 requests per minute)"}I don't see an earlier message in this conversation where you gave me the rate limit — this is the first turn I have, so I'm not carrying over that context. Also, I don't know where your API docs live. My working directory is `/tmp` and it's not a git repo. Could you tell me the path to the docs file you want updated? One thing worth flagging: 100 requests/minute works out to 6000/hour, but you're asking the docs to say 2000/hour. If that's intentional (e.g., a tighter hourly cap), no problem
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| regex /conflict|contradic|which (is correct|one is right|should i use|figure)|earlier you (said|told)|doesn'?t match|don'?t match|inconsistent|two different|not the same|discrepan|clarif|6000|6,000/i | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | acted | Remembered: Earlier I told you our API rate limit is 100 requests per minute. Now please update the API docs to say the limit is 2000 requests per hour. |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 4 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 6 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×2 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×2 | NORMAL |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2)