Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
contradictionOff = PersonalAssistant with the semantic contradiction check disabled (lexical pass only)
Note that the billing service is owned by Dana Ruiz.
Note that the billing service is owned by Dana Ruiz.
Got it — noting that the billing service is owned by Dana Ruiz. Let me know what you'd like to do with that.
The billing service is written in Go.
Got it — billing service is written in Go, owned by Dana Ruiz.
It deploys via the release-train pipeline every Thursday.
Got it — billing service: written in Go, owned by Dana Ruiz, deploys via the release-train pipeline every Thursday.
Add that the person who runs the payments team, Marcus Webb, is the billing service owner.
Just flagging a conflict: earlier you said the billing service is owned by Dana Ruiz, and now you're saying the owner is Marcus Webb (who runs the payments team). Which should I record as the owner — or is one of them an owner and the other something else (e.g., team lead)?
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| regex /conflict|contradict|inconsist|does ?n[o']t match|differ|earlier|previously|before you|you (said|mentioned|noted|told|stated)|Dana|two (different )?(owners|people)/i | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | acted | Remembered: Note that the billing service is owned by Dana Ruiz. |
| world_model | acted | Remembered: The billing service is written in Go. |
| world_model | acted | Remembered: It deploys via the release-train pipeline every Thursday. |
| world_model | acted | Remembered: Add that the person who runs the payments team, Marcus Webb, is the billing service owner. |
| evidence_reasoning | — ×4 | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×8 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| contradiction | — ×5 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| contradiction | — ×3 | checked — no conflicts found |
| diagnostics | acted ×8 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×8 | NORMAL |
| planning | — ×4 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×4 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted ×4 | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — ×4 | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted ×4 | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2) → action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2) → action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2) → action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "The billing service is written in Go."
}{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 3,
"prompt": "It deploys via the release-train pipeline every Thursday."
}{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 4,
"prompt": "Add that the person who runs the payments team, Marcus Webb, is the billing service owner."
}