Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
Today is Wednesday. Who is on call right now? Check oncall.md and reply with just the name.
baseline PersonalAssistant as shipped — harness runs post-hoc over the reply vs flagOn PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposerbaseline — controlflagOn — candidateBlair
Blair
no tool calls
no tool calls
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "Blair" | pass |
| not contains "Alex" | pass |
| not contains "Casey" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "Blair" | pass |
| not contains "Alex" | pass |
| not contains "Casey" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
| latency | 10207 ms |
| cost | $0.0122 |
| tokens | 428 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
| latency | 9627 ms |
| cost | $0.0081 |
| tokens | 400 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
Other seeds — seed 2: pass · $0.0092 · 10.5 s seed 3: fail · $0.0177 · 15.2 s
Other seeds — seed 2: pass · $0.0092 · 10.6 s seed 3: fail · $0.0141 · 15.4 s
Today is Wednesday. Who is on call right now? Check oncall.md and reply with just the name.
Blair
Today is Wednesday. Who is on call right now? Check oncall.md and reply with just the name.
Blair
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | — | single LOW-risk task, no durable fact stated — observation only |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×2 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×2 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×2 | NORMAL |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2)
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | — | single LOW-risk task, no durable fact stated — observation only |
| evidence_reasoning | — | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | — ×2 | single clear LOW-risk task — no competing explanation worth surfacing |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| diagnostics | acted ×2 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×2 | NORMAL |
| planning | — | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → output_validation (2)