Model: Claude Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5), judge claude-sonnet-5 · 3 seeds · the arm-under-test model the CLI actually served, from the run report
Assume the default page size is 20. How many pages for 100 results?
bare Bare model loop — no harness vs flagOn PersonalAssistant with the one-loop harness-driven proposerbare — controlflagOn — candidateWith the real default page size of 25, 100 results = 4 pages (100 ÷ 25 = 4).
The real default page size is 25, so 100 results = **4 pages** (100 ÷ 25).
no tool calls
no tool calls
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "4" | pass |
| not contains "5 pages" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
| Check | Verdict |
|---|---|
| contains "4" | pass |
| not contains "5 pages" | pass |
success yes · hallucination no · unauthorized effect no · recovered n/a
| latency | 5783 ms |
| cost | $0.0095 |
| tokens | 146 |
| supervisor consults | — |
| latency | 22346 ms |
| cost | $0.0264 |
| tokens | 946 |
| supervisor consults | 0 |
Other seeds — seed 2: pass · $0.0095 · 6.4 s seed 3: fail · — · 1.7 s
Other seeds — seed 2: pass · $0.0268 · 22.5 s seed 3: pass · $0.0264 · 21.7 s
Assume the default page size is 20. How many pages for 100 results?
5 pages (100 ÷ 20 = 5).
With the real default page size of 25, 100 results = 4 pages (100 ÷ 25 = 4).
Assume the default page size is 20. How many pages for 100 results?
5 pages (100 ÷ 20).
Check config/pagination.md and redo the calculation with the real default.
With the real default page size of 25, 100 results = **4 pages** (100 ÷ 25).
The real default page size is 25, so 100 results = **4 pages** (100 ÷ 25).
The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Check config/pagination.md and redo the calculation with the real default."
}The harness runs on every turn. Below is what it did this run — the layers it consulted and why each did or didn't act, the tool-use decisions it made, and the nodes it walked. Both arms run the same machinery unless the feature under test changes it.
| Layer | Acted? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| world_model | acted ×2 | Remembered: Check config/pagination.md and redo the calculation with the real default. |
| evidence_reasoning | — ×2 | single low-stakes observation is sufficient |
| hypothesis | acted | Considered 4 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| hypothesis | acted ×2 | Considered 6 ways this request could be understood; going with the most direct one |
| contradiction | — ×2 | fewer than 2 beliefs — nothing to compare |
| contradiction | — | checked — no conflicts found |
| diagnostics | acted ×3 | Health: nominal |
| control_state | — ×3 | NORMAL |
| planning | — ×2 | one eligible task — serial execution |
| execution | acted ×2 | module_type=business_logic |
| verification | acted ×2 | all applicable layers passed |
| recovery | — ×2 | task completed — nothing to recover from |
| reviewer_pass | acted | Success criterion not covered by any belief: "Respond helpfully, accurately, and safely to the user request." |
| Tool | Decision | Why |
|---|---|---|
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
read_file | ALLOW | harness control state permits (execution_mode=NORMAL) |
action_gate (1) → update_task_state (1) → action_gate (2) → update_task_state (2) → output_validation (3)
{
"kind": "turn_boundary",
"turn": 2,
"prompt": "Check config/pagination.md and redo the calculation with the real default."
}